You probably already know what your technology needs are. Maybe it’s that your security control system is outdated; whenever you push a button, you can’t be sure that a door will open or lock. Or it could be that adding digital IP cameras or integrated controls would free up significant staff time for other tasks. Or perhaps you’d love to stop managing your facility on paper and put a jail management system in place. Maybe all of these are on your list.
Match those needs to your resources (budget, staff, time) and if you’re like many correctional leaders, you likely see a gap. Getting approval for tech upgrades is typically never easy, simple or fast in the corrections world, but this is especially true for today’s resource-stretched agencies. It could be while you’re focused on, say, staff recruitment and retention or detainee well-being, other issues are seen as more urgent.
Technology improvements, though, can’t fall to the bottom of the list. These solutions address many of the most critical needs corrections leaders are facing, including:
Moving ahead with the resources you have means prioritizing what really matters. Start by answering the question, What is my most pressing technology need? It could be any of the examples mentioned above (these are among the most urgent ones we see from our customers), or it might be something else. (By the way, triaging what’s most important right now doesn’t mean everything else becomes unimportant; we’ll talk more about that below.)
Let’s use the example of a jail security-control system that has reached its end-of-life and must be replaced. Whether you’re already working with a technology partner or choosing a new one, talk to them about what you need (and be honest if you don’t know anything about security control technology or other solutions). Your partner should recognize the importance of safety, accountability and efficiency across corrections and should have deep experience in all facets of corrections technology.
Whoever you work with should also be someone you trust who can guide you through the process of choosing the right solution(s) given your needs and your resources. This is the beginning of your technology roadmap. From there, you and your technology provider will work together to create a logical plan that won’t require doing everything at once.
Perhaps your next goal is shortening the time it takes officers to generate reports for the sheriff. A jail management system (JMS) might make the most sense for your next integration because it saves so much staff time—a true boon in a challenging hiring environment.
As you fill out your map, you’ll slot in all your other needs. This process should include prioritizing interoperability. A siloed approach — in which different solutions can’t “talk” to one another — creates additional burden on an agency. If, for instance, you can’t get data from your JMS to your detainee well-being system, staff will need to re-enter this information manually. But when systems are integrated, speed and efficiency improve.
And because you already know that technology is always changing, you’ll continually update your technology roadmap (there’s no destination with this kind of map, I’m afraid). Not only will your priorities change over time, but you’ll want the opportunity to pursue new and emerging solutions as they become available. Artificial intelligence (AI) is already making an impact in corrections. For example, jails, prisons and other detention facilities will soon be able to use AI to monitor hundreds of cameras simultaneously, watching for fights or potential outbreaks of violence, something few facilities have the staff to do comprehensively, even watching cameras around the clock.
As you talk through your technology path with your partner, lay out at least a five-year plan to start. At the end of five to seven years, much of what you initially put in place will likely be obsolete or nearly so, much like smartphones or computers (few of us hang on to these for so long, after all).
Conversations with your tech provider should ensure you have a clear understanding of necessary software and hardware updates, including whether these are part of an annual support plan or something you’ll need to include in an annual budget. Ask if it’s possible to mitigate costly upgrades by spreading the financial impact over multiple years rather than in a single lump-sum payment.
The right vendor will provide you, too, with an annual technology assessment, noting which solutions are at their end-of-life, which are aging but still functional and which are still good to go. This will make it much easier to budget ahead. Whoever you work with should make it simple to update the map to take revised or new priorities into account.
By now, you can see that a lot depends on who you work with since your tech partner will guide not just the creation of a technology roadmap but its evolution over time. This year, it may be that placing digital cameras throughout your facility is all your budget can bear, but these cameras can go a long way in improving surveillance, detecting real-time detainee movement (with the help of AI, as mentioned), bolstering investigative evidence, and reducing contraband. And a regularly updated roadmap will allow you to plan and budget for other, perhaps more expensive, technologies down the road.
Ultimately, the right technology (which doesn’t mean all the technology or only technology) makes it much easier for correctional professionals to do more with less, respond more quickly, limit liability for their counties and municipalities, and hold themselves accountable to the public and taxpayers.